Table of Contents

The Market for Innovation #

How do companies transform groundbreaking ideas into tangible products and services that revolutionize industries? The answer lies in understanding the intricate dynamics of the **Market for Innovation. **Innovations translate into benefits to a company through interaction between two opposing market-like forces within that organization.

On the Supply Side of this market are the research and development (R&D) teams who are producing innovations through tireless research and development, translate their findings into tangible outputs: experimental prototypes built as Jupyter notebooks, documented APIs ready for production, or even blog posts detailing a new AI-powered product. These artifacts may eventually lead to papers, patents, publications, and presentations, but those are not the only outputs of value. While research teams might focus on fundamental questions and exploratory investigations, R&D teams concentrate on translating research findings into practical applications and tangible solutions.

On the Demand Side of this market are the product teams. They are consuming innovations by translating these innovations to address customer and organizational needs. Success for these teams is often based on customer and business outcomes and metrics.

Understanding the way this market behaves can help to improve market conditions and lead to increased benefits organizationally and commercially.

Oversupply in the Market for Innovation #

In an oversupply situation, research teams produce more innovations than the product teams can consume, translate, and apply. This can happen for a variety of reasons, such as an aggressive push for research and development or lack of communication or connection between research and product teams. Economic theory suggests that when there is an oversupply, the perceived value of innovation drops, as the sheer volume of ideas can make it difficult to identify truly impactful innovations, regardless of their inherent quality. as there is an abundance of new ideas without practical applications or demand from the product teams.

In this scenario, some consequences may include:

Waste of resources: As research teams invest time and effort in producing solutions that do not have a realistic outlet, the organization’s resources may be wasted.
Stifled Innovation: An oversupply can create a backlog of unused innovations, slowing down the overall pace of development and discouraging researchers from pursuing new ideas."
Reduced incentive: If the product teams do not perceive value in the innovations, the organization may be less willing to invest further in research and development, thus leading to reduced future innovation.
Missed opportunities: The sheer volume of innovations may make it difficult for product teams to identify the most impactful ideas, leading to overlooked opportunities.

Overdemand in the Market for Innovation #

In an overdemand situation, product teams require more innovation than the research teams can supply. This can occur if the product teams have aggressive goals, tight deadlines, or overly ambitious project ideas. Economic theory suggests that when there is an overdemand, the value of the innovation increases, potentially unsustainable, as product teams compete for the limited supply of new ideas and solutions.

On the other hand, this increased value can be misleading. Overdemand might incentivize superficial innovation, where researchers prioritize quick wins and marketable features over deeper, more impactful breakthroughs. This can lead to a proliferation of low-value or repetitive products that cater to immediate demands but fail to advance the field in a meaningful way.

In this scenario, some consequences may include:

Increased pressure on research teams: The demand for new innovations may lead to a sense of urgency for researchers, possibly compromising the quality or depth of their work.
Prioritization of immediate needs: With a high demand for innovations, research teams may be forced to prioritize short-term projects over long-term, potentially groundbreaking research.
Risk of burnout: The pressure on both research and product teams can lead to burnout, which may affect employee satisfaction and retention in the organization.
Miscalibrated research goals: The pressure to meet product team demands can lead researchers to shift their focus away from their own goals and priorities. This may cause research efforts becoming overly aligned with short-term product needs, potentially compromising the pursuit of more fundamental or groundbreaking discoveries.

Well-matched supply and demand in the Market for Innovation #

When supply and demand are well matched in the Market for Innovation, the research teams are producing an appropriate volume of high-quality, impactful innovations that align with the needs of product teams. Economic theory suggests that this equilibrium allows for a more efficient allocation of organizational resources and a dynamic, sustainable innovation cycle.

This balance is crucial for nurturing fundamental and applied research. While applied research addresses immediate product needs, fundamental research, even when seemingly disconnected from product development, often lays the foundation for future waves of innovation.

In this scenario, some consequences may include:

Alignment between teams: Research and product teams communicate and collaborate effectively, ensuring that innovations are relevant and practically applicable.
Higher value: Innovations are more likely to be successfully implemented, leading to better customer and business outcomes.
Sustainable growth: A balance between supply and demand encourages continuous, focused innovation while ensuring that the organization’s resources are used effectively.

The Market for Innovation is no mere analogy. It can also help to diagnose and triage how resources are allocated towards improving market conditions. For example, to improve the Market for Innovation in a situation where the supply is not meeting demand, an organization can consider the following strategies:

Increase research capacity: Investing in the research team by hiring more staff, providing training, or offering additional resources can help increase the production of innovations to meet the needs of product teams.
Prioritize research based on product team demands: Collaborate closely with product teams to identify their needs and priorities. Align research efforts with these priorities to ensure that the innovations produced have a greater likelihood of being implemented.
Encourage cross-functional collaboration: Establish frequent communication between research and product teams, so researchers can gain insights into product team challenges and develop solutions accordingly. Regular workshops, brainstorming sessions, and progress reviews can facilitate the flow of information and ideas.
Foster a culture of innovation: Encourage all team members, not just the research teams, to think innovatively and engage in creative problem-solving. This can help generate ideas that address the demands of product teams, and create a more agile and proactive organization.
Leverage external innovations or partnerships: In situations where the internal research capacity is limited, consider tapping into external resources such as academia, research institutions, or other industry partners. Knowledge sharing, collaboration, or licensing agreements can help access innovations that meet product team demands.
Incentivize impactful research: Develop reward structures that recognize research teams for producing relevant, high-quality innovations directly addressing product team needs, such as bonuses, promotions, or public recognition.

By implementing these strategies, the organization can strengthen its Market for Innovation, better aligning the supply of innovations with the demands of product teams and improving overall outcomes.

To improve the Innovation Economy in a situation where demand is not meeting the supply of innovations, an organization can implement the following strategies: \

Improve communication and collaboration: Encourage more frequent and effective communication between the research and product teams, ensuring that the product teams are aware of the available innovations and how they can help address their needs.
Enhance communication and educate stakeholders: Facilitate frequent and transparent communication between research, product, and even customer-facing teams. Educate customers about the potential benefits of new innovations to create a pull from the market, driving product teams to seek solutions from the research side.
Internal marketing of innovations: Strengthen the internal promotion and visibility of research outputs to increase awareness within the organization. Organize events, workshops, or presentations where research teams can share their latest findings, highlighting potential applications and benefits for product teams.
Educate and train product teams: Equip product teams with the necessary knowledge and skills to understand and adopt new innovations effectively. Regular training, workshops, or seminars can help them stay up-to-date with the latest research, technology advancements, and emerging techniques.
Create cross-functional projects: Foster collaborative, cross-functional projects that combine the expertise of research and product teams. This can cause the development of new ideas, identification of unmet needs, and facilitate the implementation of existing innovations into product teams’ workflows.
Organize innovation contests: Challenge product teams to use existing innovations to develop novel applications or explore untapped markets. Innovation contests can bring teams together and give them incentives to adopt recent research findings.
Establish a central innovation repository: Develop a central platform or database where product teams can easily find and access innovations, with detailed descriptions of their application potential, benefits, and any necessary support resources.
Align incentives with adoption: Introduce performance metrics and reward structures for the product teams that recognize and reward innovation adoption, especially when it leads to improvements in customer satisfaction, cost savings, or other important business outcomes.

By implementing such strategies, an organization can actively work on bridging the gap between the supply of innovations and their demand, fostering an environment that encourages the effective use and adoption of new ideas and solutions.

Several factors can disrupt or break the Market for Innovation, making it difficult for research and product teams to function efficiently within an organization. These factors can include:

Poor communication: Inadequate channels or lack of regular communication between research and product teams, may cause a disconnect, causing research to be misaligned with the actual needs of product teams.
Lack of organizational support: If an organization does not provide sufficient resources, funding, or management support, the innovation ecosystem can become strained, potentially limiting the overall effectiveness of the research and product teams.
Short-term thinking and pressure: Emphasizing short-term results and profit over long-term, potentially disruptive innovations can lead to a perception of closed-mindedness, constraining the scope of research and stifling novel ideas.
Mismatched incentives: If the organization’s reward structure does not align with its goals for innovation, researchers and product teams might not be motivated to pursue the most impactful or relevant projects.
Resistance to change: A rigid organizational culture that resists change or lacks adaptability can hinder the adoption of new ideas, technologies, and processes, resulting in a stifling innovation ecosystem.
Talent mismatch: An organization might fail to attract, develop, or retain the talent necessary for innovation. This can be due to inadequate recruitment strategies, insufficient professional development opportunities, or a lack of diversity and inclusion.
Internal competition: When teams within an organization are competing against each other for resources, status, or rewards, collaboration and knowledge sharing can be stifled, damaging the overall Innovation Economy.
Inefficient intellectual property management: An organization that does not effectively manage its intellectual property rights, whether by not protecting its own or infringing on those of others, can impact the success and sustainability of the innovation market.
Overemphasis on individual success: If the organization excessively focuses on individual success, it might create an environment where employees withhold knowledge or ideas instead of sharing them openly, limiting the potential for innovation.
Inefficient intellectual property management: An organization that does not effectively manage its intellectual property rights, whether by not protecting its own or infringing on those of others, can impact the success and sustainability of the innovation market. Additionally, the “Innovator’s Dilemma” poses a significant challenge. Organizations may recognize the demand for improved products but hesitate to disrupt existing offerings, even if it means ceding ground to new entrants. This has led many corporations to establish incubation labs separate from the parent company to foster disruptive innovation. For example, product teams might be resistant to adopting new research artifacts if they perceive them as too risky or if they lack the technical expertise to implement them. This can lead to a “valley of death” where promising innovations fail to reach the market due to a lack of understanding or support from the demand side.

The pursuit of innovation isn’t always a linear path from ideation to product. It’s important to acknowledge the value of fundamental research as exemplified by “Pasteur’s quadrant,” where the quest for fundamental understanding can yield unexpected and valuable applications.

It’s important to acknowledge that while aligning research and product development is crucial for efficient innovation, groundbreaking research sometimes emerges from explorations that deviate from immediate product needs.

To maintain a healthy and well-functioning Innovation Economy, organizations should identify and address these factors by fostering open communication, aligning incentives, promoting collaboration, and providing the necessary support for research and product teams.

To better understand the functioning of the Market for Innovation in a real-world setting, we can examine a prominent example. In this well-known case study, we explore how a Fortune 500 company successfully aligned the supply of innovations from its research and development teams with the demand from its product teams, leading to a groundbreaking product that revolutionized an entire industry.